<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Utah Cribs &#187; Utah News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://utahcribs.com/category/utah-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://utahcribs.com</link>
	<description>Real Estate, Homes, News, Statistics and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:25:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Developer secures financing for Sugar Hole project &#124; ksl.com</title>
		<link>http://utahcribs.com/developer-secures-financing-for-sugar-hole-project-ksl-com/</link>
		<comments>http://utahcribs.com/developer-secures-financing-for-sugar-hole-project-ksl-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 15:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>utahcribs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utah News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://utahcribs.com/?p=1719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SALT LAKE CITY — The stalled development not-so-affectionately known as the &#8220;Sugar Hole&#8221; could soon be showing signs of life.Developer<a href="http://utahcribs.com/developer-secures-financing-for-sugar-hole-project-ksl-com/">(more...)</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SALT LAKE CITY — The stalled development not-so-affectionately known as the &#8220;Sugar Hole&#8221; could soon be showing signs of life.Developer Craig Mecham says hes secured financing for his most recent vision for the  corner of 2100 South and Highland Drive in Sugar House.If all goes to plan, construction on the $51 million mix of street-level shops and restaurants, topped by five levels of apartments, will begin in spring 2012.&#8221;We think this will be a great asset for the community of Sugar House,&#8221; Mecham said.Its a scaled-back version of the project he first pitched in 2007. Those plans included a seven-story office structure and an abutting eight-story residential building, with retail on the ground floor of both buildings.The revised plans call for 44,000 square feet of retail space, with 204 one-, two- and three-bedroom apartments. Plans also include two levels of underground parking.&#8221;Given the prominence and significance of this particular location, were very excited that Mecham has his financing and designs in order and is moving forward,&#8221; said Soren Simonsen, who represents Sugar House on the Salt Lake City Council.The City Council, acting as the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City, voted Tuesday to lend Mecham $5 million for construction of the underground parking garage. The developer also has secured a $36 million construction loan from Wells Fargo, he said.Mecham plans to repay the RDA loan with parking fees collected from tenants and the public. Rent from commercial and residential properties will go toward the bank loan. The developer is putting up about $10 million for the project, according to financial documents.&#8221;Its going to be a major complement to the Sugar House area,&#8221; Mecham said.That hasnt been the case for the past four years. In January 2008, crews began demolishing the eclectic row of shops that faced 2100 South to make way for a planned 4½-acre mixed-use development.The credit crunch created by the Great Recession made securing financing for the project difficult. The development also was a casualty of Salt Lake Citys then-maligned planning division.&#8221;With the economy and political environment, there have been a lot of issues weve had to deal with,&#8221; Mecham said. &#8220;Its been a long, drawn-out process.&#8221;</p>
<p>via <a href="http://www.ksl.com/index.php?nid=148&amp;sid=18498842&amp;title=developer-secures-financing-for-sugar-hole-project" onclick="return TrackClick('http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ksl.com%2Findex.php%3Fnid%3D148%26amp%3Bsid%3D18498842%26amp%3Btitle%3Ddeveloper-secures-financing-for-sugar-hole-project','Developer+secures+financing+for+Sugar+Hole+project+%7C+ksl.com')">Developer secures financing for Sugar Hole project | ksl.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://utahcribs.com/developer-secures-financing-for-sugar-hole-project-ksl-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New tax deal may speed Cottonwood Mall revival &#124; The Salt Lake Tribune</title>
		<link>http://utahcribs.com/new-tax-deal-may-speed-cottonwood-mall-revival-the-salt-lake-tribune/</link>
		<comments>http://utahcribs.com/new-tax-deal-may-speed-cottonwood-mall-revival-the-salt-lake-tribune/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 16:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>utahcribs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utah News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://utahcribs.com/?p=1707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New tax deal may speed Cottonwood Mall revivalBy cathy mckitrickThe Salt Lake TribunePublished: May 18, 2011 12:34PMUpdated: June 2, 2011<a href="http://utahcribs.com/new-tax-deal-may-speed-cottonwood-mall-revival-the-salt-lake-tribune/">(more...)</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New tax deal may speed Cottonwood Mall revivalBy cathy mckitrickThe Salt Lake TribunePublished: May 18, 2011 12:34PMUpdated: June 2, 2011 02:31AMAl Hartmann | The Salt Lake Tribune A fence remains around the empty lot of the former Cottonwood Mall at 4835 S. Highland Drive. Holladay officials hope the approval of an extension of tax increment financing will jump-start the redevelopment of the property.With the exception of Macy’s department store, the 57-acre Cottonwood Mall property sits vacant in Holladay, a victim of the recent recession.However, buildings soon could sprout on the sprawling space if its new developer, Dallas-based Howard Hughes Corp., can obtain a four-year extension from the city and other affected government entities on the scheduled start date of a 20-year tax subsidy.A 2008 agreement channels 75 percent of new property tax dollars generated by the urban renewal project back to the developer over a 20-year period, starting no later than 2013. Holladay city also pledged to give back 75 percent of its sales tax revenue during that time.Howard Hughes consultant Kris Longson told the Holladay City Council last week that the company needs more time to build the first phase, which is why it needs an extension on the subsidy.“We need to represent to our board that it’s all still in place that if they move forward, they can still make it work financially,” Longson told the council.At stake is $96 million in new property-tax dollars to offset the project’s infrastructure costs.Longson seeks a new vote of the project’s taxing entity committee — which includes the county, city, school district and others — that would authorize the 20-year diversion of new tax dollars to begin no later than 2017.Completion of Cottonwood’s Phase 1 will start the flow of tax dollars to the developer. As previously agreed, the Howard Hughes Corp. must invest a minimum of $226 million into Phase 1, constructing 134 residential units and adjacent retail and office amenities.General Growth Properties owned the 1960s-era mall and razed it in 2008, intending to invest $550 million to build a high-end, phased neighborhood of homes, retail and office space in its place. Preliminary work took place to reroute Cottonwood Creek through the property and also to raise portions of it several feet.However, the economic downturn drove GGP toward bankruptcy, stalling the ambitious construction project for more than three years.In November 2010, General Growth emerged as two publicly traded companies, having completed the spinoff of the standalone Howard Hughes Corp., which focuses on master-planned developments.On its website — howardhughes.com — the company touts the Cottonwood project as a town center that will one day “serve Salt Lake City’s most affluent neighborhoods.”At build-out, the property could feature 614 residential units, 575,000 square feet of retail and 195,000 square feet of office space.Randall Feil, attorney for Holladay’s Redevelopment Agency, said Howard Hughes Corp. would need all 20 years of tax incentives to make the project work.“If they finish [Phase 1] in 2014, the trigger year would be 2015,” Feil told the City Council.City Manager Randy Fitts remains cautiously optimistic about how soon and how fast the immense overhaul can happen.“When they arrive in our building permit office and lay some plans down, then we’ll get excited,” Fitts said.The start of actual construction will be cause for celebration in this small east-side city, Fitts added. “Next to our city’s incorporation, that will be probably the biggest news we’ve had.”cmckitrick@sltrib.comTwitter: @catmck</p>
<p>via <a href="http://www.sltrib.com/csp/cms/sites/sltrib/pages/printerfriendly.csp?id=51832278" onclick="return TrackClick('http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sltrib.com%2Fcsp%2Fcms%2Fsites%2Fsltrib%2Fpages%2Fprinterfriendly.csp%3Fid%3D51832278','New+tax+deal+may+speed+Cottonwood+Mall+revival+%7C+The+Salt+Lake+Tribune')">New tax deal may speed Cottonwood Mall revival | The Salt Lake Tribune</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://utahcribs.com/new-tax-deal-may-speed-cottonwood-mall-revival-the-salt-lake-tribune/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Home Affordability At Its Highest in Nearly Two Decades</title>
		<link>http://utahcribs.com/home-affordability-at-its-highest-in-nearly-two-decades/</link>
		<comments>http://utahcribs.com/home-affordability-at-its-highest-in-nearly-two-decades/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 18:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>utahcribs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utah News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://utahcribs.com/?p=1672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The combination of stabilizing home prices and super-low interest rates has led to housing becoming more affordable now than it<a href="http://utahcribs.com/home-affordability-at-its-highest-in-nearly-two-decades/">(more...)</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The combination of stabilizing home prices and super-low interest rates has led to housing becoming more affordable now than it has been at any time over the last two decades, according to a press release by the National Association of Home Builders.Homes are more affordable now than they have been in two decades. Now if only we could obtain some credit&#8230; © Galina Barskaya &#8211; Fotolia.comThe latest NAHB/Wells Fargo Housing Opportunity Index HOI showed that 72.9 % of homes sold over the last quarter, were affordable for families that earned an income of at least $64,000, which is the present national median income. This is the eleventh successive quarter in which this housing affordability measure has scored over 70%. In previous years, the measure rarely scored over 60%, showing just how far housing affordability has come in the last few years.However, just because homes are affordable, doesn’t mean that everyone can take advantage of the fact. Bob Nielsen, chairman of the NAHB, was quoted as saying that although housing affordability is at its highest level in 20 years, the difficulty in obtaining credit remained one of the biggest stumbling blocks to people looking to buy a home:“Tough economic conditions — particularly in markets that experienced major changes in house prices and production — as well as extremely tight credit conditions confronting home buyers and builders continue to remain significant obstacles to many potential home sales.”But for those lucky few who do have the means to obtain credit or buy a property outright, the pickings now are exceedingly rich. Take the Lakeland-Winter Haven, Fla., area, where a nationwide high 92.5% of all homes sold in the last quarter were said to be affordable to those households earning at least $53,800, the median annual income for that area.Other major markets in which homes are extremely affordable right now included Indianapolis-Carmel, Ind.; Toledo, Ohio; Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, Ohio-Pa.; and Ogden-Clearfield, Utah.And it’s not just larger markets where homes are becoming more affordable – some smaller markets have seen an astonishingly high number of affordable property sales over the last quarter, such as Fairbanks, Alaska, which led the nation with 97.8% of all homes sold being rated affordable for those earning the state’s median annual income of $91,700.It’s not all easy pickings though, as some areas are still proving to be completely unaffordable. New York-White Plains-Wayne, N.Y.-N.J., led the nation in having the least number of affordable home sales, at just 23.3%.</p>
<p>via <a href="http://realtybiznews.com/home-affordability-at-its-highest-in-nearly-two-decades/9877168/" onclick="return TrackClick('http%3A%2F%2Frealtybiznews.com%2Fhome-affordability-at-its-highest-in-nearly-two-decades%2F9877168%2F','Home+Affordability+At+Its+Highest+in+Nearly+Two+Decades')">Home Affordability At Its Highest in Nearly Two Decades</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://utahcribs.com/home-affordability-at-its-highest-in-nearly-two-decades/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The 8 Healthiest Housing Markets &#124; Realtor Magazine</title>
		<link>http://utahcribs.com/the-8-healthiest-housing-markets-realtor-magazine/</link>
		<comments>http://utahcribs.com/the-8-healthiest-housing-markets-realtor-magazine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 19:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>utahcribs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utah News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://utahcribs.com/?p=1623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This was just posted in Realtor Magazine. They have done a study of the 8 healthiest real estate markets in<a href="http://utahcribs.com/the-8-healthiest-housing-markets-realtor-magazine/">(more...)</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was just posted in Realtor Magazine. They have done a study of the 8 healthiest real estate markets in the country. Utah is Number 3!! Finally some good new to read.  This was no surprise to us, as we have had one of our best years ever in sales.. If you have any questions about the Real Estate market in Salt Lake City, UT  give us a call.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>3. Salt Lake City, Utah</p>
<p>2011 Building Permit Forecast: 1,294</p>
<p>2012 Building Permit Forecast: 1,181</p>
<p>With lots of high-tech businesses, Salt Lake City is poised to have some grains in employment and income in the coming year. After a drop in home prices, prices are expected to rebound and increase 4.7 percent next year.</p>
<p>via <a href="http://realtormag.realtor.org/daily-news/2011/11/07/8-healthiest-housing-markets#.TriY4riI8kM.facebook" onclick="return TrackClick('http%3A%2F%2Frealtormag.realtor.org%2Fdaily-news%2F2011%2F11%2F07%2F8-healthiest-housing-markets%23.TriY4riI8kM.facebook','The+8+Healthiest+Housing+Markets+%7C+Realtor+Magazine')">The 8 Healthiest Housing Markets | Realtor Magazine</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://utahcribs.com/the-8-healthiest-housing-markets-realtor-magazine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Best Real Estate Deal in Salt Lake City Today!</title>
		<link>http://utahcribs.com/best-real-estate-deal-in-salt-lake-city-today/</link>
		<comments>http://utahcribs.com/best-real-estate-deal-in-salt-lake-city-today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 21:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>utahcribs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Real Estate Deals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utah News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://utahcribs.com/?p=1620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you are looking for a deal in the Salt Lake Valley area. Keep coming back, we will continue to<a href="http://utahcribs.com/best-real-estate-deal-in-salt-lake-city-today/">(more...)</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are looking for a deal in the Salt Lake Valley area. Keep coming back, we will continue to post the deal of the day as we see them..</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Best Real estate deals in Utah.</p>
<div id="mls-1061189">
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td rowspan="3" width="66"><a><img src="http://photo.wfrmls.com/65x50/1061189.jpg" alt="" width="65" height="50" border="1" /></a></td>
<td width="66"><a title="View property report">1061189</a></td>
<td width="75"><a title="Click for Mortgage Calculator">$279,000</a></td>
<td width="105">Active</td>
<td width="105">2-Story</td>
<td width="85">4,271</td>
<td width="85">$0</td>
<td width="140">4425 S / 1929 E</td>
<td width="50">10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3"><a title="View Map">1929 E OSAGE ORANGE</a></td>
<td colspan="2">Holladay, UT</td>
<td>0.23</td>
<td>None</td>
<td>1/0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5/4.00/2</td>
<td title="Full/90%" colspan="2">Full/90%</td>
<td>10/26/2011</td>
<td></td>
<td><a>1956</a></td>
<td colspan="2">Single Family</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<div id="mls-1033856">
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td rowspan="3" width="66"><a><img src="http://photo1.wfrmls.com/65x50/1033856.jpg" alt="" width="65" height="50" border="1" /></a></td>
<td width="66"><a title="View property report">1033856</a></td>
<td width="75"><a title="Click for Mortgage Calculator">$320,000</a></td>
<td width="105">Active</td>
<td width="105">2-Story</td>
<td width="85">4,617</td>
<td width="85">$0</td>
<td width="140">14795 S / 1925 E</td>
<td width="50">13</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3"><a title="View Map">14795 S GOLDENLEAF</a></td>
<td colspan="2">Draper, UT</td>
<td>0.32</td>
<td>None</td>
<td>3/0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5/4.00/1</td>
<td title="Daylight; Full/25%" colspan="2">Daylight; Full/25%</td>
<td>05/17/2011</td>
<td></td>
<td>2000</td>
<td colspan="2">Single Family</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<pre>
</pre>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://utahcribs.com/best-real-estate-deal-in-salt-lake-city-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Holladay Utah Real Estate Statistics</title>
		<link>http://utahcribs.com/holladay-utah-real-estate-statistics/</link>
		<comments>http://utahcribs.com/holladay-utah-real-estate-statistics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 18:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>utahcribs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utah News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://utahcribs.com/?p=1612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The two simple graphs above show the true story in Holladay.  Despite the media&#8217;s perception Holladay has fared better than<a href="http://utahcribs.com/holladay-utah-real-estate-statistics/">(more...)</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://utahcribs.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/holladay-utah-real-estate-avg-price-sq-foot.png" alt="" width="600" height="216" /><br />
<span id="more-1612"></span><br />
<img src="http://utahcribs.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/holladay-utah-real-estate-avg-sales-price.png" alt="" width="600" height="216" /></p>
<p>The two simple graphs above show the true story in Holladay.  Despite the media&#8217;s perception Holladay has fared better than most in downturn of the real estate market.  The AVERAGE sales price in Holladay 2007 VS thus far in 2011 has only decreased 7%.  This is mainly due to the fact that more homes have sold over $1,000,000 in Holladay than any other zip code.  Even then  you analyze the price per foot decrease in the same time period Holladay has only lost 25% in value compared to Salt Lake Counties overall decrease of 38%.  When it comes to the FACTS you need to have a Real Estate Broker that knows the market and has a proven track record of success.  The Utah Cribs Team sets the new bench mark.  We can provide any market specific data you want to help you make an educated decision.  Give us a try.</p>
<p><a href="http://utahcribs.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Holladay-Stats.pdf" onclick="return TrackClick('http%3A%2F%2Futahcribs.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F11%2FHolladay-Stats.pdf','Holladay+Stats')">Holladay Stats</a></p>
<table width="580" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle"><strong>Month</strong></td>
<td valign="middle"><strong>Count</strong></td>
<td valign="middle"><strong>Volume</strong></td>
<td valign="middle"><strong>Original Asking  $</strong></td>
<td valign="middle"><strong>Avg Sold $</strong></td>
<td valign="middle"><strong>Sale to ask Ratio</strong></td>
<td valign="middle"><strong>Avg SQ FT</strong></td>
<td valign="middle"><strong>Avg $/SQ FT</strong></td>
<td valign="middle"><strong>Avg Beds</strong></td>
<td valign="middle"><strong>Avg Baths</strong></td>
<td valign="middle"><strong>Avg Days on Market</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Oct-06</td>
<td valign="bottom">29</td>
<td valign="bottom">$8,936,250.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$324,279.31</td>
<td valign="bottom">$308,146.55</td>
<td valign="bottom">95%</td>
<td valign="bottom">2,189</td>
<td valign="bottom">$142.72</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">2</td>
<td valign="bottom">38</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Nov-06</td>
<td valign="bottom">24</td>
<td valign="bottom">$8,604,100.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$398,745.79</td>
<td valign="bottom">$358,504.17</td>
<td valign="bottom">90%</td>
<td valign="bottom">2,624</td>
<td valign="bottom">$144.03</td>
<td valign="bottom">4</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">48</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Dec-06</td>
<td valign="bottom">23</td>
<td valign="bottom">$11,344,269.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$592,136.96</td>
<td valign="bottom">$493,229.09</td>
<td valign="bottom">83%</td>
<td valign="bottom">3,337</td>
<td valign="bottom">$147.81</td>
<td valign="bottom">4</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">84</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Jan-07</td>
<td valign="bottom">26</td>
<td valign="bottom">$8,250,025.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$343,269.23</td>
<td valign="bottom">$317,308.65</td>
<td valign="bottom">92%</td>
<td valign="bottom">2,442</td>
<td valign="bottom">$133.06</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">2</td>
<td valign="bottom">50</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Feb-07</td>
<td valign="bottom">14</td>
<td valign="bottom">$4,021,800.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$305,639.29</td>
<td valign="bottom">$287,271.43</td>
<td valign="bottom">94%</td>
<td valign="bottom">1,999</td>
<td valign="bottom">$142.77</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">2</td>
<td valign="bottom">45</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Mar-07</td>
<td valign="bottom">32</td>
<td valign="bottom">$11,805,055.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$410,218.44</td>
<td valign="bottom">$368,907.97</td>
<td valign="bottom">90%</td>
<td valign="bottom">2,488</td>
<td valign="bottom">$144.59</td>
<td valign="bottom">4</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">84</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Apr-07</td>
<td valign="bottom">28</td>
<td valign="bottom">$9,831,000.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$386,246.43</td>
<td valign="bottom">$351,107.14</td>
<td valign="bottom">91%</td>
<td valign="bottom">2,339</td>
<td valign="bottom">$146.24</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">2</td>
<td valign="bottom">57</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">May-07</td>
<td valign="bottom">43</td>
<td valign="bottom">$18,825,458.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$467,488.33</td>
<td valign="bottom">$437,801.35</td>
<td valign="bottom">94%</td>
<td valign="bottom">2,686</td>
<td valign="bottom">$153.16</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">55</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Jun-07</td>
<td valign="bottom">32</td>
<td valign="bottom">$15,678,875.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$532,709.38</td>
<td valign="bottom">$489,964.84</td>
<td valign="bottom">92%</td>
<td valign="bottom">2,654</td>
<td valign="bottom">$163.59</td>
<td valign="bottom">4</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">48</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Jul-07</td>
<td valign="bottom">35</td>
<td valign="bottom">$12,261,900.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$365,447.14</td>
<td valign="bottom">$350,340.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">96%</td>
<td valign="bottom">2,275</td>
<td valign="bottom">$148.67</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">2</td>
<td valign="bottom">36</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Aug-07</td>
<td valign="bottom">36</td>
<td valign="bottom">$12,989,800.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$380,402.78</td>
<td valign="bottom">$360,827.78</td>
<td valign="bottom">95%</td>
<td valign="bottom">2,235</td>
<td valign="bottom">$165.95</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">2</td>
<td valign="bottom">45</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Sep-07</td>
<td valign="bottom">17</td>
<td valign="bottom">$7,931,804.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$517,584.12</td>
<td valign="bottom">$466,576.71</td>
<td valign="bottom">90%</td>
<td valign="bottom">3,068</td>
<td valign="bottom">$147.80</td>
<td valign="bottom">4</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">71</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Oct-07</td>
<td valign="bottom">19</td>
<td valign="bottom">$6,276,500.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$353,399.47</td>
<td valign="bottom">$330,342.11</td>
<td valign="bottom">93%</td>
<td valign="bottom">2,415</td>
<td valign="bottom">$142.81</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">48</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Nov-07</td>
<td valign="bottom">15</td>
<td valign="bottom">$5,212,900.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$396,830.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$347,526.67</td>
<td valign="bottom">88%</td>
<td valign="bottom">2,375</td>
<td valign="bottom">$154.52</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">125</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Dec-07</td>
<td valign="bottom">22</td>
<td valign="bottom">$7,324,200.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$370,281.82</td>
<td valign="bottom">$332,918.18</td>
<td valign="bottom">90%</td>
<td valign="bottom">2,073</td>
<td valign="bottom">$158.55</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">2</td>
<td valign="bottom">87</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Jan-08</td>
<td valign="bottom">11</td>
<td valign="bottom">$3,595,300.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$394,917.73</td>
<td valign="bottom">$326,845.45</td>
<td valign="bottom">83%</td>
<td valign="bottom">2,317</td>
<td valign="bottom">$142.97</td>
<td valign="bottom">4</td>
<td valign="bottom">2</td>
<td valign="bottom">131</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Feb-08</td>
<td valign="bottom">19</td>
<td valign="bottom">$6,099,004.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$370,731.58</td>
<td valign="bottom">$321,000.21</td>
<td valign="bottom">87%</td>
<td valign="bottom">2,392</td>
<td valign="bottom">$136.40</td>
<td valign="bottom">4</td>
<td valign="bottom">2</td>
<td valign="bottom">143</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Mar-08</td>
<td valign="bottom">13</td>
<td valign="bottom">$3,137,270.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$267,364.46</td>
<td valign="bottom">$241,328.46</td>
<td valign="bottom">90%</td>
<td valign="bottom">1,757</td>
<td valign="bottom">$139.91</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">2</td>
<td valign="bottom">101</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Apr-08</td>
<td valign="bottom">24</td>
<td valign="bottom">$6,288,235.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$301,170.83</td>
<td valign="bottom">$262,009.79</td>
<td valign="bottom">87%</td>
<td valign="bottom">2,058</td>
<td valign="bottom">$131.91</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">2</td>
<td valign="bottom">111</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">May-08</td>
<td valign="bottom">29</td>
<td valign="bottom">$9,951,826.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$387,534.48</td>
<td valign="bottom">$343,166.41</td>
<td valign="bottom">89%</td>
<td valign="bottom">2,436</td>
<td valign="bottom">$143.46</td>
<td valign="bottom">4</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">94</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Jun-08</td>
<td valign="bottom">19</td>
<td valign="bottom">$6,312,625.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$377,547.37</td>
<td valign="bottom">$332,243.42</td>
<td valign="bottom">88%</td>
<td valign="bottom">2,306</td>
<td valign="bottom">$146.23</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">167</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Jul-08</td>
<td valign="bottom">23</td>
<td valign="bottom">$7,876,703.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$390,547.83</td>
<td valign="bottom">$342,465.35</td>
<td valign="bottom">88%</td>
<td valign="bottom">2,622</td>
<td valign="bottom">$131.62</td>
<td valign="bottom">4</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">152</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Aug-08</td>
<td valign="bottom">27</td>
<td valign="bottom">$8,683,900.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$368,399.96</td>
<td valign="bottom">$321,625.93</td>
<td valign="bottom">87%</td>
<td valign="bottom">2,470</td>
<td valign="bottom">$135.03</td>
<td valign="bottom">4</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">118</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Sep-08</td>
<td valign="bottom">20</td>
<td valign="bottom">$5,695,125.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$361,461.75</td>
<td valign="bottom">$284,756.25</td>
<td valign="bottom">79%</td>
<td valign="bottom">1,998</td>
<td valign="bottom">$137.01</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">2</td>
<td valign="bottom">174</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Oct-08</td>
<td valign="bottom">23</td>
<td valign="bottom">$6,983,050.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$345,795.65</td>
<td valign="bottom">$303,610.87</td>
<td valign="bottom">88%</td>
<td valign="bottom">2,168</td>
<td valign="bottom">$143.31</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">2</td>
<td valign="bottom">92</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Nov-08</td>
<td valign="bottom">13</td>
<td valign="bottom">$3,442,831.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$346,723.08</td>
<td valign="bottom">$264,833.15</td>
<td valign="bottom">76%</td>
<td valign="bottom">2,010</td>
<td valign="bottom">$142.82</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">2</td>
<td valign="bottom">172</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Dec-08</td>
<td valign="bottom">10</td>
<td valign="bottom">$4,656,830.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$777,270.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$465,683.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">60%</td>
<td valign="bottom">3,519</td>
<td valign="bottom">$131.70</td>
<td valign="bottom">4</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">169</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Jan-09</td>
<td valign="bottom">10</td>
<td valign="bottom">$2,922,400.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$352,130.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$292,240.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">83%</td>
<td valign="bottom">2,806</td>
<td valign="bottom">$110.29</td>
<td valign="bottom">4</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">153</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Feb-09</td>
<td valign="bottom">12</td>
<td valign="bottom">$4,382,226.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$558,608.33</td>
<td valign="bottom">$365,185.50</td>
<td valign="bottom">65%</td>
<td valign="bottom">3,463</td>
<td valign="bottom">$114.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">4</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">298</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Mar-09</td>
<td valign="bottom">21</td>
<td valign="bottom">$5,578,090.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$347,080.95</td>
<td valign="bottom">$265,623.33</td>
<td valign="bottom">77%</td>
<td valign="bottom">2,500</td>
<td valign="bottom">$114.56</td>
<td valign="bottom">4</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">186</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Apr-09</td>
<td valign="bottom">23</td>
<td valign="bottom">$6,599,450.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$374,123.87</td>
<td valign="bottom">$286,932.61</td>
<td valign="bottom">77%</td>
<td valign="bottom">2,325</td>
<td valign="bottom">$123.80</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">2</td>
<td valign="bottom">193</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">May-09</td>
<td valign="bottom">22</td>
<td valign="bottom">$9,319,880.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$543,009.09</td>
<td valign="bottom">$423,630.91</td>
<td valign="bottom">78%</td>
<td valign="bottom">2,642</td>
<td valign="bottom">$142.83</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">136</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Jun-09</td>
<td valign="bottom">33</td>
<td valign="bottom">$14,084,777.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$578,212.12</td>
<td valign="bottom">$426,811.42</td>
<td valign="bottom">74%</td>
<td valign="bottom">2,931</td>
<td valign="bottom">$129.14</td>
<td valign="bottom">4</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">205</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Jul-09</td>
<td valign="bottom">27</td>
<td valign="bottom">$8,777,755.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$365,840.74</td>
<td valign="bottom">$325,102.04</td>
<td valign="bottom">89%</td>
<td valign="bottom">2,628</td>
<td valign="bottom">$128.82</td>
<td valign="bottom">4</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">107</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Aug-09</td>
<td valign="bottom">29</td>
<td valign="bottom">$8,334,273.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$348,510.34</td>
<td valign="bottom">$287,388.72</td>
<td valign="bottom">82%</td>
<td valign="bottom">2,394</td>
<td valign="bottom">$122.31</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">129</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Sep-09</td>
<td valign="bottom">24</td>
<td valign="bottom">$8,823,700.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$430,210.83</td>
<td valign="bottom">$367,654.17</td>
<td valign="bottom">85%</td>
<td valign="bottom">2,744</td>
<td valign="bottom">$126.21</td>
<td valign="bottom">4</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">129</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Oct-09</td>
<td valign="bottom">23</td>
<td valign="bottom">$7,230,200.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$386,486.91</td>
<td valign="bottom">$314,356.52</td>
<td valign="bottom">81%</td>
<td valign="bottom">2,105</td>
<td valign="bottom">$142.63</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">2</td>
<td valign="bottom">150</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Nov-09</td>
<td valign="bottom">31</td>
<td valign="bottom">$10,207,700.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$407,273.10</td>
<td valign="bottom">$329,280.65</td>
<td valign="bottom">81%</td>
<td valign="bottom">2,451</td>
<td valign="bottom">$134.94</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">176</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Dec-09</td>
<td valign="bottom">25</td>
<td valign="bottom">$7,848,800.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$421,348.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$313,952.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">75%</td>
<td valign="bottom">3,148</td>
<td valign="bottom">$109.88</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">177</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Jan-10</td>
<td valign="bottom">17</td>
<td valign="bottom">$5,300,150.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$403,058.12</td>
<td valign="bottom">$311,773.53</td>
<td valign="bottom">77%</td>
<td valign="bottom">2,874</td>
<td valign="bottom">$122.75</td>
<td valign="bottom">4</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">129</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Feb-10</td>
<td valign="bottom">13</td>
<td valign="bottom">$3,808,900.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$390,328.54</td>
<td valign="bottom">$292,992.31</td>
<td valign="bottom">75%</td>
<td valign="bottom">2,651</td>
<td valign="bottom">$114.56</td>
<td valign="bottom">4</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">178</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Mar-10</td>
<td valign="bottom">18</td>
<td valign="bottom">$10,099,640.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$790,911.11</td>
<td valign="bottom">$561,091.11</td>
<td valign="bottom">71%</td>
<td valign="bottom">3,168</td>
<td valign="bottom">$144.66</td>
<td valign="bottom">4</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">180</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Apr-10</td>
<td valign="bottom">26</td>
<td valign="bottom">$12,030,600.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$648,637.58</td>
<td valign="bottom">$462,715.38</td>
<td valign="bottom">71%</td>
<td valign="bottom">3,011</td>
<td valign="bottom">$134.60</td>
<td valign="bottom">4</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">162</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">May-10</td>
<td valign="bottom">20</td>
<td valign="bottom">$5,006,200.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$271,405.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$250,310.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">92%</td>
<td valign="bottom">2,156</td>
<td valign="bottom">$120.34</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">72</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Jun-10</td>
<td valign="bottom">31</td>
<td valign="bottom">$12,550,550.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$476,629.03</td>
<td valign="bottom">$404,856.45</td>
<td valign="bottom">85%</td>
<td valign="bottom">3,396</td>
<td valign="bottom">$120.74</td>
<td valign="bottom">4</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">135</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Jul-10</td>
<td valign="bottom">30</td>
<td valign="bottom">$11,235,500.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$422,123.33</td>
<td valign="bottom">$374,516.67</td>
<td valign="bottom">89%</td>
<td valign="bottom">3,346</td>
<td valign="bottom">$113.39</td>
<td valign="bottom">4</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">115</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Aug-10</td>
<td valign="bottom">20</td>
<td valign="bottom">$6,986,255.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$401,940.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$349,312.75</td>
<td valign="bottom">87%</td>
<td valign="bottom">2,950</td>
<td valign="bottom">$121.25</td>
<td valign="bottom">4</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">161</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Sep-10</td>
<td valign="bottom">18</td>
<td valign="bottom">$8,860,010.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$584,455.56</td>
<td valign="bottom">$492,222.78</td>
<td valign="bottom">84%</td>
<td valign="bottom">3,345</td>
<td valign="bottom">$139.78</td>
<td valign="bottom">4</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">127</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Oct-10</td>
<td valign="bottom">31</td>
<td valign="bottom">$14,027,734.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$512,603.23</td>
<td valign="bottom">$452,507.55</td>
<td valign="bottom">88%</td>
<td valign="bottom">3,287</td>
<td valign="bottom">$130.78</td>
<td valign="bottom">4</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">124</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Nov-10</td>
<td valign="bottom">14</td>
<td valign="bottom">$4,713,750.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$376,935.71</td>
<td valign="bottom">$336,696.43</td>
<td valign="bottom">89%</td>
<td valign="bottom">2,728</td>
<td valign="bottom">$121.45</td>
<td valign="bottom">4</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">123</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Dec-10</td>
<td valign="bottom">14</td>
<td valign="bottom">$4,546,141.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$360,871.43</td>
<td valign="bottom">$324,724.36</td>
<td valign="bottom">90%</td>
<td valign="bottom">2,880</td>
<td valign="bottom">$109.80</td>
<td valign="bottom">4</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">107</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Jan-11</td>
<td valign="bottom">15</td>
<td valign="bottom">$4,338,865.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$333,160.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$289,257.67</td>
<td valign="bottom">87%</td>
<td valign="bottom">2,642</td>
<td valign="bottom">$108.48</td>
<td valign="bottom">4</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">157</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Feb-11</td>
<td valign="bottom">16</td>
<td valign="bottom">$5,090,250.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$367,265.56</td>
<td valign="bottom">$318,140.63</td>
<td valign="bottom">87%</td>
<td valign="bottom">2,971</td>
<td valign="bottom">$108.07</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">116</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Mar-11</td>
<td valign="bottom">21</td>
<td valign="bottom">$7,328,873.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$399,990.43</td>
<td valign="bottom">$348,993.95</td>
<td valign="bottom">87%</td>
<td valign="bottom">2,805</td>
<td valign="bottom">$110.14</td>
<td valign="bottom">4</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">137</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Apr-11</td>
<td valign="bottom">15</td>
<td valign="bottom">$5,821,500.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$472,113.33</td>
<td valign="bottom">$388,100.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">82%</td>
<td valign="bottom">2,548</td>
<td valign="bottom">$132.54</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">149</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">May-11</td>
<td valign="bottom">29</td>
<td valign="bottom">$8,552,700.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$339,265.48</td>
<td valign="bottom">$294,920.69</td>
<td valign="bottom">87%</td>
<td valign="bottom">2,662</td>
<td valign="bottom">$113.40</td>
<td valign="bottom">4</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">143</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Jun-11</td>
<td valign="bottom">20</td>
<td valign="bottom">$5,955,100.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$355,800.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$297,755.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">84%</td>
<td valign="bottom">2,722</td>
<td valign="bottom">$103.12</td>
<td valign="bottom">4</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">114</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Jul-11</td>
<td valign="bottom">21</td>
<td valign="bottom">$6,334,500.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$352,866.62</td>
<td valign="bottom">$301,642.86</td>
<td valign="bottom">85%</td>
<td valign="bottom">2,710</td>
<td valign="bottom">$117.66</td>
<td valign="bottom">4</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">175</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Aug-11</td>
<td valign="bottom">22</td>
<td valign="bottom">$6,540,400.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$358,359.09</td>
<td valign="bottom">$297,290.91</td>
<td valign="bottom">83%</td>
<td valign="bottom">3,005</td>
<td valign="bottom">$100.32</td>
<td valign="bottom">4</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">129</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Sep-11</td>
<td valign="bottom">26</td>
<td valign="bottom">$12,806,250.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$767,007.69</td>
<td valign="bottom">$492,548.08</td>
<td valign="bottom">64%</td>
<td valign="bottom">3,486</td>
<td valign="bottom">$120.02</td>
<td valign="bottom">4</td>
<td valign="bottom">3</td>
<td valign="bottom">220</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Oct-11</td>
<td valign="bottom">4</td>
<td valign="bottom">$1,767,500.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$484,750.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">$441,875.00</td>
<td valign="bottom">91%</td>
<td valign="bottom">3,830</td>
<td valign="bottom">$129.71</td>
<td valign="bottom">4</td>
<td valign="bottom">4</td>
<td valign="bottom">113</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: normal;"><br />
</span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://utahcribs.com/holladay-utah-real-estate-statistics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Look Ahead at New Homes of 2015 &#8211; Yahoo! Real Estate</title>
		<link>http://utahcribs.com/a-look-ahead-at-new-homes-of-2015-yahoo-real-estate/</link>
		<comments>http://utahcribs.com/a-look-ahead-at-new-homes-of-2015-yahoo-real-estate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 17:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>utahcribs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Real Estate News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utah News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://utahcribs.com/?p=1610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Photovoltaics and galvanized siding are green features of this Kihei, HI home.Photo: ZillowIf you had asked someone in the 1960s<a href="http://utahcribs.com/a-look-ahead-at-new-homes-of-2015-yahoo-real-estate/">(more...)</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Photovoltaics and galvanized siding are green features of this Kihei, HI home.Photo: ZillowIf you had asked someone in the 1960s what the home of 2015 would look like, chances are they imagined something akin to The Jetsons’ home complete with Rosie the Robot and other space-age appliances that dressed and fed the family.But, rather than space-age technology, the biggest thing that is expected to change in future single-family homes is the size.More from Zillow » SF’s Albion Castle and its Underground Caverns» Why the “99” Price Grabs Buyers» Pros and Cons of Owning in a Historic District“Homes will get smaller,” says Stephen Melman, Director of Economic Services at the National Association of Home Builders NAHB in Washington D.C. “We asked builders, ‘what do you anticipate the new home size would be by 2015?’ ”According to the results of the study, surveyed home builders expect new single-family homes to check in at an average of 2,150 square feet. Current single family homes measure around 2,400 square feet, which is already a decrease from the peak home size in 2007 of 2,521.While the decrease in home size has a lot to do with the recession, many believe that the real estate changes will stick around even after the economy and home values get back on solid ground.This Sherman Oaks, CA home has a great room, encompassing dining, living and family rooms.Photo: Zillow“Although affordability is driving these decisions, smaller homes are a positive for builders,” said Melman. “It allows for more creative design, more amenities, better flow. It’s an opportunity to deliver a better home.”Home digital control panels can help manage security and energy consumption.Photo: Control4Other things that make up the home of 2015? No more living room. According to the survey, 52 percent of builders expect the living room to merge with other spaces and 30 percent believe that it will vanish completely to save on square footage. Instead, expect to see great rooms — a space that combines the family and living room and flows into the kitchen.Expect to see more:spacious laundry roomsmaster suite walk-in closetsporcheseat-in kitchenstwo-car garagesceiling fansExpect to see less:mudroomsformal dining roomsfour bedrooms or moremedia or hobby roomsskylights Many of these changes reflect a desire for builders and consumers going green. Smaller space means more efficient heating and cooling. Ceiling fans distribute heat evenly while skylights, on the other hand, release heat.However, as builders look to go green, they’ll be installing energy-efficient windows and compact fluorescent and LED lighting, as well as water-efficient appliances and plumbing.Additionally, many new homes will have the baby boomer population in mind with walk-in showers, ground-floor master bedrooms and grab bars.“A bigger share of the new homes will be purchased by people 55 or 65 and older,” said Melman. “They’re more likely to have more cash for a down payment, but they’re empty nesters, so they don’t need five bedrooms.”</p>
<p>via <a href="http://realestate.yahoo.com/promo/a-look-ahead-at-new-homes-of-2015.html" onclick="return TrackClick('http%3A%2F%2Frealestate.yahoo.com%2Fpromo%2Fa-look-ahead-at-new-homes-of-2015.html','A+Look+Ahead+at+New+Homes+of+2015+-+Yahoo%21+Real+Estate')">A Look Ahead at New Homes of 2015 &#8211; Yahoo! Real Estate</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://utahcribs.com/a-look-ahead-at-new-homes-of-2015-yahoo-real-estate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Economic Review</title>
		<link>http://utahcribs.com/economic-review/</link>
		<comments>http://utahcribs.com/economic-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 22:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>utahcribs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interest Rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utah News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://utahcribs.com/?p=1608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; The dominant theme for the third quarter was flight to safety, with bonds generally rising and stocks falling sharply.<a href="http://utahcribs.com/economic-review/">(more...)</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The dominant theme for the third quarter was flight to safety, with bonds generally rising and stocks falling sharply. In an environment marked by particular concern about the Eurozone, both the US dollar and Japanese yen were sought as safe havens by investors.</p>
<p>as of September 30, 2011</p>
<p>Economic</p>
<p>Review</p>
<p>Most US bond indexes delivered positive numbers, with results ranging from approximately +3 to +6%. Notably, long-term US Treasuries benefited handsomely from the implementation of Operation Twist, the Federal Reserve’s program to sell short-term and buy long-term government debt.</p>
<p>Within US equities, the typically riskier small caps were down more than large caps. As well, international equities, encompassing emerging and developed markets, underperformed the US market. While the MSCI All Country World ex-US Index retreated -19.78% for the quarter, the drop in the US S&amp;P 500 Total Return Index was smaller at -13.87%.</p>
<p>Commodities and real estate also lost ground. The Dow Jones UBS Commodity Total Return Index ended the quarter down -11.33%, while the FTSE NAREIT All Equity REITs Total Return Index fell -15.07%.</p>
<p><strong>Challenges Facing Europe </strong></p>
<p>Much of the risk aversion in the equity market can be traced to continuing economic challenges in Europe. In particular, Greek default remains a possibility; Spain and Italy are both financially strained; the European financial sector is under stress; and European companies in general are warning of “shortfalls.”1</p>
<p>1 Ewen Cameron Watt, et al, “Recalibrating Investment Strategies After a Summer of Volatility,” BlackRock Special Market Update, September 12, 2011.</p>
<p>2 Bob Doll, et al, “What’s Next for the Global Markets?” BlackRock Special Market Update, September 27, 2011.</p>
<p>3 Robert Scherfke, PhD, “Watch the World: Markets Versus Policy,” Wellington Management Viewpoints, September 2011.</p>
<p>These hurdles, however, are not insurmountable. The European Union may successfully expand the available capital needed to stabilize various countries and put plans in place that could support growth. 2 And when assessing potential outcomes in Europe, it is important to keep in mind that “there is more room for monetary stimulus in Europe. The European Central Bank (ECB) actually raised rates [recently]… and it could certainly cut rates by quite a lot.”3</p>
<p><strong>Grounds for Optimism in Asia and the US </strong></p>
<p>There are also bright spots in both Asia and the US to consider. Despite signs of slowing in global growth, which can threaten exports, “Asia still has much more policy flexibility than the developed world.” And</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://utahcribs.com/economic-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Utah&#8217;s New Condominium Law</title>
		<link>http://utahcribs.com/utahs-new-condominium-law/</link>
		<comments>http://utahcribs.com/utahs-new-condominium-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>utahcribs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Real Estate News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utah News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://utahcribs.com/?p=1605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Utah&#8217;s New Condominium Law by Mark A. Reese Utah has a new law that affects everyone in the state who<a href="http://utahcribs.com/utahs-new-condominium-law/">(more...)</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Utah&#8217;s New Condominium Law</p>
<p>by Mark A. Reese</p>
<p>Utah has a new law that affects everyone in the state who owns a condominium.  Under the old law, Condominium Associations were responsible for damages to the exterior of each residential building, but the interior of the building was the responsibility of the individual unit owner.  Floor coverings, kitchen cabinets, bathroom vanities, and other fixtures that were permanently attached to the building needed to be solely by covered by the unit owner’s policy.  So, in addition to your contents, you needed to have an adequate amount of Building Coverage to replace any part of the interior that might be damaged.  On July 1, 2011, that all changed.</p>
<p>Under Utah Senate Bill 167 which has now become law, the blanket insurance policy carried by Condominium Associations must also provide coverage for the interior of each residential unit.  You might imagine how that is changing the insurance needs for associations and individual condo owners.  One neighbor may not have made many improvements to their home since they first purchased it.  Another may have added gilded crown molding, an imported crystal chandelier, and expanded their designer kitchen.  Clearly, each would have different insurance needs, but who, the association or the unit owner would pay for a loss to the interior of the building?</p>
<p>The new law reads in part, an Association of Unit Owners shall maintain:</p>
<p>“…property insurance on the physical structures in the condominium project, including common areas and facilities, limited common areas and facilities and units, insuring against all risks of direct physical loss commonly insured against, including fire and extended coverage perils…”</p>
<p>“Property insurance shall include coverage for any fixtures, improvements, or betterments installed by a unit owner or to a limited common area, including a floor covering, cabinet, light fixture, electrical fixture, heating or plumbing fixture, paint, wall covering, window and any other item permanently part of or affixed to a unit…”</p>
<p>At first glance, it might seem that since the association is responsible to extend coverage to the interior of the building, you may not need as much coverage.  But given that condominium associations and insurance companies could find it more difficult to maintain the right level of coverage over time, associations are electing to increase their deductibles—up to $10,000 under the new law.  So, who pays that deductible?</p>
<p>The new ruling goes on to say:</p>
<p>“If, in the exercise of the business judgment rule, the management committee determines that a claim is likely not to exceed the property insurance policy deductible of the association of unit owners; the unit owner’s policy is considered the policy for primary coverage to the amount of the policy deductible of the association of unit owners; a unit owner who does not have a policy to cover the property insurance policy deductible of the association of unit owners is responsible for the loss to the amount of the policy deductible…”</p>
<p>While this may seem overwhelming for many, remembering two things will keep you pointed in the right direction.  First, with the passage of this senate bill, it’s very important to make certain you understand the provisions of your condominium association’s policy, including the policy’s deductibles and exclusions.  Second, as insurance policies become more complex, the need to scrutinize each policy and to integrate one policy with another is essential to avoiding gaps in coverage.  If you are uncertain whether your policy is adequate in light of the new law, consult with an insurance agent who can guide you through the details.</p>
<p>via <a href="http://www.lefavi.com/radio/newsletter-articles/185" onclick="return TrackClick('http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lefavi.com%2Fradio%2Fnewsletter-articles%2F185','Utah%22s+New+Condominium+Law')">Utah&#8217;s New Condominium Law</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://utahcribs.com/utahs-new-condominium-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Auction &#8211; Salt Lake City, Utah &#8211; Saturday, November 5, 2011 &#8211; 35 Contemporary Lofts and 2 Luxury Condos</title>
		<link>http://utahcribs.com/auction-salt-lake-city-utah-saturday-november-5-2011-35-contemporary-lofts-and-2-luxury-condos/</link>
		<comments>http://utahcribs.com/auction-salt-lake-city-utah-saturday-november-5-2011-35-contemporary-lofts-and-2-luxury-condos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 14:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>utahcribs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Real Estate Deals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utah News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://utahcribs.com/?p=1603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Auction &#8211; Salt Lake City, Utah &#8211; Saturday, November 5, 2011 &#8211; 35 Contemporary Lofts and 2 Luxury Condos. &#160;<a href="http://utahcribs.com/auction-salt-lake-city-utah-saturday-november-5-2011-35-contemporary-lofts-and-2-luxury-condos/">(more...)</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.slccondoauction.com/" onclick="return TrackClick('http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slccondoauction.com%2F','Auction+-+Salt+Lake+City%2C+Utah+-+Saturday%2C+November+5%2C+2011+-+35+Contemporary+Lofts+and+2+Luxury+Condos')">Auction &#8211; Salt Lake City, Utah &#8211; Saturday, November 5, 2011 &#8211; 35 Contemporary Lofts and 2 Luxury Condos</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>If you are looking for a steal on a condo, go buy one from this Auction I will see you there.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://utahcribs.com/auction-salt-lake-city-utah-saturday-november-5-2011-35-contemporary-lofts-and-2-luxury-condos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

